Spring til indhold

Brugerdiskussion:Palnatoke/Automatarkiv 63

Sidens indhold er ikke tilgængeligt på andre sprog.
Fra Wikipedia, den frie encyklopædi

Wikidata weekly summary #180

[rediger kildetekst]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.
Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Lydia Pintscher (WMDE) 19. okt 2015, 15:20 (CEST)


Tech News: 2015-43

[rediger kildetekst]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

  • Tech News is trying to make reading the newsletter easier. The Recurrent item icon means the item is in the newsletter every week, but with new dates. The For technical readers icon means the item is mainly relevant for readers with technical knowledge. You can leave feedback on this change.
  • Timestamps in the protection log will now be in the user's timezone. Previously they would show Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). [3]

Problems

  • A problem with MediaWiki made some pages show no content on October 14. This has now been fixed. [4]
  • Some templates were misplaced in the Flow description bar. This could make it impossible to click on links. This will be fixed this week. [5]
  • The deployment of the new MediaWiki version was stopped on October 14. No new code was deployed for the rest of week. This meant planned changes did not happen. [6]

Changes this week

  • Changes that were planned to happen last week will happen this week. [7]
  • Wikispecies, Meta and MediaWiki.org will be able to use Wikidata for sitelinks. [8][9][10][11]

Meetings

  • Recurrent item You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 20 October at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

19. okt 2015, 18:02 (CEST)

Skanderborg?

[rediger kildetekst]

Hejsa. Er du på Skanderborg Museum p.t.? Mvh Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 21. okt 2015, 13:18 (CEST)

Aha, efter lidt stalking kan jeg se at det er du. Hvis der er tid, så kunne det måske være en ide at tage en snak om teksten på http://www.skanderborgleksikon.dk/index.php/Ophavsret, nærmere bestemt sætningen "Brug af hele artikler kan kun ske efter aftale med Skanderborg Historiske Arkiv." og hvordan det hænger sammen med deres generelle CC-licens. Mvh Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 21. okt 2015, 13:37 (CEST)
Og nu er jeg i toget på vej hjem. Vi (Bruger:LouiseThisgaard og jeg) sad på arkivet sammen med Bruger:Leifjuul, der er inspektør og arkivar, så konkret tror jeg godt, vi kan sige at der er en aftale. Det er en del af et projekt om at få delt lokalhistoriske museers og arkivers viden med/på Wikipedia. Jeg spørger Leif om formuleringen (og satser på at han også bemærker pinget herfra). --Palnatoke (diskussion) 21. okt 2015, 14:31 (CEST)
Hej. Det var nu ikke så meget i forbindelse med dagens redigeringer, men mere generelt fremover . Bare så alle er klar over hvad de går ind til og så evt. misforståelser kan ryddes af vejen. Mvh Knud Winckelmann (diskussion) 21. okt 2015, 14:41 (CEST)
Louise blev også lidt forundret over så hurtigt, du nåede at skrive til hende. Og du har ganske ret i at de skal have deres ophavsretsside bragt på linje med deres licens. Der lader i øvrigt til fra næste år at være en aftale mellem CopyDan og arkiverne, som vi nok skal læse op på - den er omtalt på side 5 her. Jeg er ikke ganske overbevist om at aftalen er fri nok til Wikipedia. --Palnatoke (diskussion) 21. okt 2015, 14:51 (CEST)


ListeriaBot

[rediger kildetekst]

Hej, hvor tit opdateres autolisterne med botten og betyder "automatisk" at nogen skal sætte den i gang med en specifik liste, eller er det "rigtigt" automatisk? TherasTaneel (diskussion) 21. okt 2015, 16:50 (CEST)

Jeg tror at man skal sætte den i gang - jeg har endnu ikke set opdateringer, som lignede en næsten-samtidig opdatering af en masse urelaterede lister. --Palnatoke (diskussion) 21. okt 2015, 17:00 (CEST)

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

[rediger kildetekst]
News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia


Wikidata weekly summary #181

[rediger kildetekst]
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Tech News: 2015-44

[rediger kildetekst]

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Changes this week

  • Recurrent item The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from October 27. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from October 28. It will be on all Wikipedias from October 29 (calendar).
  • The first time you use the visual editor, pop-ups will explain why and when you should use the citation and link tools. [12]
  • You will be able to upload images to Wikimedia Commons from inside the wikitext editor by clicking "Upload" in the "Indsæt fil" dialog. You will also be able to drag and drop them into an article when using the visual editor. [13][14]
  • When you edit a code block in visual editor, you will have the syntax highlighted. [15][16]
  • Index and Page namespaces on Wikisource will be defined as content namespaces in $wgContentNamespaces. [17]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

26. okt 2015, 19:04 (CET)

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

[rediger kildetekst]
News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia

Thanks (sarcasm)

[rediger kildetekst]

for labeling my page that I worked on for the benefit of the site and marked as a stub because I was going to improve it later, Polandball, as something that was a "bad job" essentially. People even went to that page and fixed grammatical errors and such too. I am like, totally against labels. They're really offensive to me, since I try really hard to contribute here for the benefit of Danish Wikipedia's coverage of all phenomenons. I do this so that the Danish Wikipedia will eventually have millions of articles on an extensive amount of topics. I do this because I live in the US, and though I'm not a native Danish speaker, I have a high interest in the Danish culture and language. By putting {{dåsedansk}} on my article, you're basically telling me "I don't feel like going and fixing your errors, and I don't care that you worked very hard on this article. Your 3+ years of study on the Danish language and culture are shit, and your article is shit!" I don't care about Wikipedia's immediatist policy, all of your dåsedansk labels are very offensive. Philmonte101 (diskussion) 1. nov 2015, 14:23 (CET)

Clicking on "Gem side" means "this article is good enough for general consumption", but it was not. Besides, not caring about Wikipedia's policies is probably not a good thing if you want to contribute. --Palnatoke (diskussion) 1. nov 2015, 14:33 (CET)
I just don't understand why you would just label it that and not take the time to fix the errors, after I took the time to create the articles. For instance, with Lake Conestee Nature Park and Polandball, somebody needs to go in and fix the grammatical errors. I see what you're doing as lazy, and I don't think laziness is a part of Wikipedia's policy. It's like saying "Well you worked two long hours on Lake Conestee Nature Park, and there were 4 grammatical errors, but I won't take the 5 minutes to scan the article and fix all the errors after you spent 2 hours of work on it." Philmonte101 (diskussion) 1. nov 2015, 14:40 (CET)
In the case of Polandball, fixing the error would mean deleting the article if the subject isn't notable. As to correcting grammar, well, no. When going through articles, I decide which articles to fix now, and which articles to mark for *someone* to fix at some time. That *someone* could be me, or it could be someone else. It could even be you - once your Danish improves enough. --Palnatoke (diskussion) 1. nov 2015, 14:47 (CET)
Is Alien and Sedition Acts dåsedansk? Philmonte101 (diskussion) 1. nov 2015, 14:55 (CET)
I would say thay it was. --Palnatoke (diskussion) 2. nov 2015, 07:45 (CET)
I totaly agree with Palnatoke, it was "dåsedansk". The costruction of the senteces and the grammar in the original post by you, made it difficult to catch the content. mvh Per (PerV) (diskussion) 2. nov 2015, 08:14 (CET)
And just to make it clear: Danish is a hard language to get right. --Palnatoke (diskussion) 2. nov 2015, 08:23 (CET)
Hentet fra "https://da.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brugerdiskussion:Palnatoke/Automatarkiv_63&oldid=8358941"